Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-0.3953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Zambia
-0.4076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
125th
Zambia rank
126th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Zambia
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.25199620102024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -0.3953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia, a difference of 0.0123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Zambia ranks 126th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6945 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0989 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4132 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s -0.2486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0096 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s -0.448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zambia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -0.3953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
0.0123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and Zambia ranks 126th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zambia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.