Bhutan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Bhutan
0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.4599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bhutan rank
71st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
68th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Bhutan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-1-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.4599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Bhutan ranks 71st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 68th of 206 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s -0.8972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s -0.6098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bhutan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.4599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Bhutan ranks 71st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 68th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bhutan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.