Bangladesh vs Turkey: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Bangladesh
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Turkey ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 164th and Turkey ranks 162nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | -0.5341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Turkey |
| 2010s | -0.7509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Turkey |
| 2020s | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bangladesh or Turkey?
- Turkey, at -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bangladesh and Turkey?
- 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Turkey?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Turkey rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bangladesh ranks 164th and Turkey ranks 162nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.