Azerbaijan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Azerbaijan
-1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
185th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
183rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1199620102024

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 185th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1990s -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Azerbaijan
2000s -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Azerbaijan
2010s -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Azerbaijan
2020s -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Azerbaijan or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Azerbaijan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Azerbaijan ranks 185th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/lao-pdr/">Azerbaijan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.