Australia vs Estonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Australia
1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Estonia
1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Australia rank
15th
Estonia rank
17th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Australia
  • Estonia
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Estonia, a difference of 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 15th and Estonia ranks 17th of 208 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Australia
2000s 1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Australia
2010s 1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Australia
2020s 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Australia or Estonia?
Australia, at 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Estonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Australia and Estonia?
0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Estonia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Australia and Estonia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Australia ranks 15th and Estonia ranks 17th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Estonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/australia/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/australia/estonia/">Australia vs Estonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.