Aruba vs Spain: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Aruba
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Spain ahead.
Aruba ranks 29th and Spain ranks 28th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Spain |
| 2010s | 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Aruba or Spain?
- Spain, at 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Aruba and Spain?
- 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Spain?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Spain rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 29th and Spain ranks 28th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.