Armenia vs North Macedonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Armenia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.6 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Armenia ranks 93rd and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | -0.5871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | -0.3169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Armenia or North Macedonia?
- Armenia, at 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Armenia and North Macedonia?
- 0.0465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and North Macedonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and North Macedonia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Armenia ranks 93rd and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.