Armenia vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Armenia
0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mongolia
0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Armenia rank
93rd
Mongolia rank
92nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Armenia
  • Mongolia
-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Armenia, a difference of 0.0067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.

Armenia ranks 93rd and Mongolia ranks 92nd of 206 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2000s -0.5871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2010s -0.3169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2020s 0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Armenia or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Armenia and Mongolia?
0.0067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Armenia ranks 93rd and Mongolia ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/armenia/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/armenia/mongolia/">Armenia vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.