Argentina vs Romania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Argentina
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 74th and Romania ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.4441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.4278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0028 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.4985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Argentina or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Argentina and Romania?
- 0.0018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Romania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Argentina ranks 74th and Romania ranks 73rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.