Argentina vs Romania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Argentina
0.4476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Romania
0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Argentina rank
75th
Romania rank
76th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Argentina
  • Romania
00.20.40.6199620102025

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.4476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania, a difference of 0.0067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 75th and Romania ranks 76th of 208 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.233 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Argentina
2000s 0.4557 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.388 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0677 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Argentina
2010s 0.4913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Argentina
2020s 0.5264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Argentina or Romania?
Argentina, at 0.4476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Argentina and Romania?
0.0067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Romania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Romania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Argentina ranks 75th and Romania ranks 76th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Romania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/argentina/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/argentina/romania/">Argentina vs Romania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.