Argentina vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Argentina
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 74th and Montenegro ranks 72nd of 206 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.4441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0626 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.4278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2020s | 0.4985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Argentina or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Argentina and Montenegro?
- 0.0054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Montenegro?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Montenegro rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Argentina ranks 74th and Montenegro ranks 72nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.