Argentina vs Bhutan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Argentina
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 74th and Bhutan ranks 71st of 206 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.4441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.4278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
| 2020s | 0.4985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Argentina or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Argentina and Bhutan?
- 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bhutan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Bhutan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Argentina ranks 74th and Bhutan ranks 71st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.