Djibouti vs Hong Kong: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Djibouti
76.92
in 2014
Hong Kong
92.31
in 2014
Djibouti rank
27th
Hong Kong rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Djibouti
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 92.31 against 76.92 in Djibouti, a difference of 15.39.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 27th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.77 | 84.62 | 33.85 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 76.92 | 92.31 | 15.38 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Djibouti or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 92.31 against 76.92 in Djibouti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Djibouti and Hong Kong?
- 15.39, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Hong Kong?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Djibouti and Hong Kong rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Djibouti ranks 27th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.