Denmark vs Djibouti: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Denmark
92.31
in 2014
Djibouti
76.92
in 2014
Denmark rank
3rd
Djibouti rank
1st
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Denmark
- Djibouti
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 92.31 against 76.92 in Djibouti, a difference of 15.39.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 3rd and Djibouti ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.31 | 50.77 | 41.54 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 92.31 | 76.92 | 15.38 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Denmark or Djibouti?
- Denmark, at 92.31 against 76.92 in Djibouti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Denmark and Djibouti?
- 15.39, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Djibouti?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Denmark and Djibouti rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Denmark ranks 3rd and Djibouti ranks 1st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.