Hong Kong (China) vs Singapore: Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Hong Kong (China)
95.36
in 2014
Singapore
96.47
in 2014
Hong Kong (China) rank
2nd
Singapore rank
1st

Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Hong Kong (China)
  • Singapore
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 96.47 against 95.36 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 1.11.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 183 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong (China) Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 91.45 96.73 5.27 Singapore
2010s 95.19 96.67 1.48 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score, Hong Kong (China) or Singapore?
Singapore, at 96.47 against 95.36 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score between Hong Kong (China) and Singapore?
1.11, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Singapore?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Hong Kong (China) ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Singapore: Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong (China) vs Singapore: Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with exporting and importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport. The time and cost necessary to complete 4 predefined stages (document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling) for exporting and importing the goods are recorded. All documents needed by the trader to export or import the goods across the border are also recorded. The process of exporting goods ranges from packing the goods into the container at the warehouse to their departure from the port of exit. The process of importing goods ranges from the vessel’s arrival at the port of entry to the cargo’s delivery at the warehouse. For landlocked economies, since the seaport is located in the transit economy, the time, cost and documents associated with the processes at the inland border are also included. The score for trading across borders is a simple average of the cost to export and import, time to export and import, and the number documents to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.