Central African Republic vs Kyrgyz Republic: Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Central African Republic
6.48
in 2014
Kyrgyz Republic
9.7
in 2014
Central African Republic rank
181st
Kyrgyz Republic rank
178th

Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Kyrgyz Republic
051015200520092014

How they compare

Kyrgyz Republic currently reports 9.7 against 6.48 in Central African Republic, a difference of 3.22.

That makes Kyrgyz Republic's figure about 1.5 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 181st and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 178th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyz Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Kyrgyz Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 7.24 3.05 4.19 Central African Republic
2010s 6.05 12.79 6.74 Kyrgyz Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Kyrgyz Republic?
Kyrgyz Republic, at 9.7 against 6.48 in Central African Republic as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Kyrgyz Republic?
3.22, with Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Kyrgyz Republic?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Central African Republic and Kyrgyz Republic rank globally for trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Central African Republic ranks 181st and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 178th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Kyrgyz Republic: Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-db06-15-methodology-score/central-african-republic/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-db06-15-methodology-score/central-african-republic/kyrgyz-republic/">Central African Republic vs Kyrgyz Republic: Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with exporting and importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport. The time and cost necessary to complete 4 predefined stages (document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling) for exporting and importing the goods are recorded. All documents needed by the trader to export or import the goods across the border are also recorded. The process of exporting goods ranges from packing the goods into the container at the warehouse to their departure from the port of exit. The process of importing goods ranges from the vessel’s arrival at the port of entry to the cargo’s delivery at the warehouse. For landlocked economies, since the seaport is located in the transit economy, the time, cost and documents associated with the processes at the inland border are also included. The score for trading across borders is a simple average of the cost to export and import, time to export and import, and the number documents to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.