Kyrgyzstan vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Kyrgyzstan
6,000 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Rwanda
4,990 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Rwanda rank
11th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k200520092014

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 6,000 DB06-15 methodology against 4,990 DB06-15 methodology in Rwanda, a difference of 1,010 DB06-15 methodology.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 183 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 5,736 DB06-15 methodology 5,042 DB06-15 methodology 693.89 DB06-15 methodology Kyrgyzstan
2010s 5,221 DB06-15 methodology 4,045 DB06-15 methodology 1,176 DB06-15 methodology Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Kyrgyzstan or Rwanda?
Kyrgyzstan, at 6,000 DB06-15 methodology against 4,990 DB06-15 methodology in Rwanda as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda?
1,010 DB06-15 methodology, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/rwanda/">Kyrgyzstan vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.