Israel vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Israel
565 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
577 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Israel rank
179th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
178th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Israel
  • Sao Tome and Principe
5001.0k1.5k2.0k200520092014

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 577 DB06-15 methodology against 565 DB06-15 methodology in Israel, a difference of 12 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 179th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 178th of 184 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 707.22 DB06-15 methodology 1,569 DB06-15 methodology 862.25 DB06-15 methodology Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 598.14 DB06-15 methodology 713.62 DB06-15 methodology 115.48 DB06-15 methodology Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Israel or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 577 DB06-15 methodology against 565 DB06-15 methodology in Israel as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Israel and Sao Tome and Principe?
12 DB06-15 methodology, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sao Tome and Principe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Israel and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Israel ranks 179th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 178th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/israel/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/israel/sao-tome-and-principe/">Israel vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.