Hong Kong, China vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Hong Kong, China
565 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Tonga
500 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Hong Kong, China rank
179th
Tonga rank
182nd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Tonga
02505007501.0k1.2k200520092014

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 565 DB06-15 methodology against 500 DB06-15 methodology in Tonga, a difference of 65 DB06-15 methodology.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tonga ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 182nd of 184 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 580.64 DB06-15 methodology 781.76 DB06-15 methodology 201.13 DB06-15 methodology Tonga
2010s 583.55 DB06-15 methodology 521.07 DB06-15 methodology 62.48 DB06-15 methodology Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Hong Kong, China or Tonga?
Hong Kong, China, at 565 DB06-15 methodology against 500 DB06-15 methodology in Tonga as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Hong Kong, China and Tonga?
65 DB06-15 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Tonga?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong, China and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 182nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/tonga/">Hong Kong, China vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.