Eritrea, The State of vs Guinea-Bissau: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Eritrea, The State of
2,000 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau
2,006 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Eritrea, The State of rank
49th
Guinea-Bissau rank
48th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Eritrea, The State of
  • Guinea-Bissau
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k200520092014

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2,006 DB06-15 methodology against 2,000 DB06-15 methodology in Eritrea, The State of, a difference of 6 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eritrea, The State of ahead.

Eritrea, The State of ranks 49th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 48th of 183 countries.

Eritrea, The State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea, The State of Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 4,968 DB06-15 methodology 2,282 DB06-15 methodology 2,685 DB06-15 methodology Eritrea, The State of
2010s 2,484 DB06-15 methodology 2,085 DB06-15 methodology 399.22 DB06-15 methodology Eritrea, The State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Eritrea, The State of or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 2,006 DB06-15 methodology against 2,000 DB06-15 methodology in Eritrea, The State of as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Eritrea, The State of and Guinea-Bissau?
6 DB06-15 methodology, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea, The State of and Guinea-Bissau?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eritrea, The State of and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Eritrea, The State of ranks 49th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 48th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea, The State of vs Guinea-Bissau: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/eritrea/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/eritrea/guinea-bissau/">Eritrea, The State of vs Guinea-Bissau: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.