Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
1,600 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Tanzania
1,615 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
66th
Tanzania rank
64th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Tanzania
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200520092014

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 1,615 DB06-15 methodology against 1,600 DB06-15 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 15 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 66th and Tanzania ranks 64th of 183 countries.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 2,769 DB06-15 methodology 2,436 DB06-15 methodology 333.93 DB06-15 methodology Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2010s 1,952 DB06-15 methodology 1,883 DB06-15 methodology 68.79 DB06-15 methodology Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 1,615 DB06-15 methodology against 1,600 DB06-15 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Tanzania?
15 DB06-15 methodology, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Tanzania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 66th and Tanzania ranks 64th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/equatorial-guinea/tanzania/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.