Ecuador vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Ecuador
1,520 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Mauritania
1,523 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Ecuador rank
77th
Mauritania rank
76th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200520092014

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 1,523 DB06-15 methodology against 1,520 DB06-15 methodology in Ecuador, a difference of 3 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 77th and Mauritania ranks 76th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 1,807 DB06-15 methodology 1,822 DB06-15 methodology 14.73 DB06-15 methodology Mauritania
2010s 1,602 DB06-15 methodology 1,581 DB06-15 methodology 20.47 DB06-15 methodology Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Ecuador or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 1,523 DB06-15 methodology against 1,520 DB06-15 methodology in Ecuador as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Ecuador and Mauritania?
3 DB06-15 methodology, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Ecuador ranks 77th and Mauritania ranks 76th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.