Dominican Republic vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Dominican Republic
1,145 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Suriname
1,190 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
119th
Suriname rank
116th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Suriname
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k200520092014

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1,190 DB06-15 methodology against 1,145 DB06-15 methodology in Dominican Republic, a difference of 45 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 119th and Suriname ranks 116th of 184 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 1,543 DB06-15 methodology 1,732 DB06-15 methodology 188.6 DB06-15 methodology Suriname
2010s 1,281 DB06-15 methodology 1,257 DB06-15 methodology 23.81 DB06-15 methodology Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Dominican Republic or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1,190 DB06-15 methodology against 1,145 DB06-15 methodology in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Dominican Republic and Suriname?
45 DB06-15 methodology, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Suriname?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Dominican Republic and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Dominican Republic ranks 119th and Suriname ranks 116th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/dominican-republic/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/dominican-republic/suriname/">Dominican Republic vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.