China vs Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

China
799.95 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Egypt
790 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
China rank
152nd
Egypt rank
154th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • China
  • Egypt
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k200520092014

How they compare

China currently reports 799.95 DB06-15 methodology against 790 DB06-15 methodology in Egypt, a difference of 9.95 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Egypt ahead.

China ranks 152nd and Egypt ranks 154th of 183 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Egypt Difference Ahead
2000s 637.08 DB06-15 methodology 1,994 DB06-15 methodology 1,357 DB06-15 methodology Egypt
2010s 702.3 DB06-15 methodology 949.35 DB06-15 methodology 247.05 DB06-15 methodology Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), China or Egypt?
China, at 799.95 DB06-15 methodology against 790 DB06-15 methodology in Egypt as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between China and Egypt?
9.95 DB06-15 methodology, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Egypt?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do China and Egypt rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
China ranks 152nd and Egypt ranks 154th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/china/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/china/egypt-arab-rep/">China vs Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.