Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Azerbaijan, Republic of
3,450 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Sudan
3,400 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
20th
Sudan rank
21st

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Azerbaijan, Republic of
  • Sudan
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k200520092014

How they compare

Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 3,450 DB06-15 methodology against 3,400 DB06-15 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 50 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sudan ahead.

Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 21st of 183 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan, Republic of Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 5,410 DB06-15 methodology 9,626 DB06-15 methodology 4,216 DB06-15 methodology Sudan
2010s 3,974 DB06-15 methodology 6,020 DB06-15 methodology 2,046 DB06-15 methodology Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Azerbaijan, Republic of or Sudan?
Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 3,450 DB06-15 methodology against 3,400 DB06-15 methodology in Sudan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Sudan?
50 DB06-15 methodology, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 21st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/azerbaijan/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/azerbaijan/sudan/">Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.