Rwanda vs Tajikistan, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Rwanda
17.93
in 2014
Tajikistan, Republic of
0
in 2014
Rwanda rank
173rd
Tajikistan, Republic of rank
176th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Rwanda
- Tajikistan, Republic of
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 17.93 against 0 in Tajikistan, Republic of, a difference of 17.93.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 173rd and Tajikistan, Republic of ranks 176th of 183 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tajikistan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.02 | 0 | 17.02 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 34.71 | 0 | 34.71 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Rwanda or Tajikistan, Republic of?
- Rwanda, at 17.93 against 0 in Tajikistan, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Rwanda and Tajikistan, Republic of?
- 17.93, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tajikistan, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Rwanda and Tajikistan, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Rwanda ranks 173rd and Tajikistan, Republic of ranks 176th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.