Bahamas vs Honduras: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Bahamas
75.11
in 2014
Honduras
77.6
in 2014
Bahamas rank
126th
Honduras rank
122nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Bahamas
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 77.6 against 75.11 in Bahamas, a difference of 2.49.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Honduras ahead.
Bahamas ranks 126th and Honduras ranks 122nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.08 | 79.2 | 0.875 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 77.9 | 78.8 | 0.9008 | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Bahamas or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 77.6 against 75.11 in Bahamas as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Bahamas and Honduras?
- 2.49, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Honduras?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Bahamas and Honduras rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Bahamas ranks 126th and Honduras ranks 122nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.