How does Bahamas rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?

Bahamas ranks 124th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met rising or falling in Bahamas?

Over the last ten years it is down 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met in Bahamas

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met in Bahamas
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Bahamas: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met was 75.11 in 2014. ▼ Falling

Latest (2014)

75.11

Change on year

up 0.3%

World rank

124th

of 181 countries

All-time high

80.59

in 2009

All-time low

74.87

in 2013

Years of data

2007–2014

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met in Bahamas, 2007–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met in Bahamas stood at 75.11.

That represents a change of up 0.3% on the previous year and down 5.4% over ten years.

That places Bahamas 124th out of 181 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	80.08	79.43	80.59	3
2010s	77.9	74.87	80.32	5

Countries ranked near Bahamas

121 Honduras 77.6 compare
122 Canada 76.71 compare
123 Bolivia 75.56 compare
125 Namibia 74.49 compare
126 Moldova 73.34 compare
127 Mexico 73.02 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Bahamas

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0325 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 13.04 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 13.08 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 16.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 20.53 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.1503 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 5.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0054 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.2514 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.2091 (2050)

All data for Bahamas →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met in Bahamas?: Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met in Bahamas was 75.11 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met recorded in Bahamas?: The highest recorded value was 80.59 in 2009.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met recorded in Bahamas?: The lowest recorded value was 74.87 in 2013.
How does Bahamas rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?: Bahamas ranks 124th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met rising or falling in Bahamas?: Over the last ten years it is down 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bahamas data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.