Japan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)

Japan
829.25 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
843 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Japan rank
140th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
138th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Japan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
02505007501.0k200520092014

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 843 DB06-15 methodology against 829.25 DB06-15 methodology in Japan, a difference of 13.75 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Japan ranks 140th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 184 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 813.54 DB06-15 methodology 929.73 DB06-15 methodology 116.19 DB06-15 methodology Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 855.46 DB06-15 methodology 919.62 DB06-15 methodology 64.15 DB06-15 methodology Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated), Japan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 843 DB06-15 methodology against 829.25 DB06-15 methodology in Japan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) between Japan and Trinidad and Tobago?
13.75 DB06-15 methodology, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Trinidad and Tobago?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Japan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
Japan ranks 140th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/japan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/japan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Japan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.