Myanmar vs Sudan: Trade in environmental goods as share of total imports
Trade in environmental goods as share of total imports over time
- Myanmar
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 131st and Sudan ranks 129th of 164 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trade in environmental goods as share of total imports, Myanmar or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Myanmar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in trade in environmental goods as share of total imports between Myanmar and Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Myanmar and Sudan rank globally for trade in environmental goods as share of total imports?
- Myanmar ranks 131st and Sudan ranks 129th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as Trade in environmental goods as share of total imports (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protection—such as goods related to pollution management and resource management—and adapted goods—which are goods that have been specifically modified to be more “environmentally friendly” or “cleaner.” A relatively high share of environmental goods imports indicates that a country purchases a significant share of environmental goods from other countries. A relatively high share of environmental goods exports indicates that a country produces and sells a significant share of environmental goods to other countries. A country’s environmental goods trade balance is the difference between its exports and imports of environmental goods.