Netherlands vs Oman: Total Reserves, annual growth rate
Netherlands
16.02 % change on previous year
in 2025
Oman
15.49 % change on previous year
in 2016
Netherlands rank
54th
Oman rank
56th
Total Reserves, annual growth rate over time
- Netherlands
- Oman
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 16.02 % change on previous year against 15.49 % change on previous year in Oman, a difference of 0.53 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Oman ahead.
Netherlands ranks 54th and Oman ranks 56th of 163 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.69 % change on previous year | 22.14 % change on previous year | 14.45 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 2010s | -3.3 % change on previous year | 7.62 % change on previous year | 10.92 % change on previous year | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, annual growth rate, Netherlands or Oman?
- Netherlands, at 16.02 % change on previous year against 15.49 % change on previous year in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total reserves, annual growth rate between Netherlands and Oman?
- 0.53 % change on previous year, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Oman?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Netherlands and Oman rank globally for total reserves, annual growth rate?
- Netherlands ranks 54th and Oman ranks 56th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Total Reserves. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.