Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Total Reserves, annual growth rate
Kazakhstan
42.75 % change on previous year
in 2025
Malawi
45.31 % change on previous year
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
14th
Malawi rank
11th
Total Reserves, annual growth rate over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 45.31 % change on previous year against 42.75 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.56 % change on previous year.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 11th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.74 % change on previous year | -1.42 % change on previous year | 41.16 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 5.63 % change on previous year | 42.55 % change on previous year | 36.91 % change on previous year | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, annual growth rate, Kazakhstan or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 45.31 % change on previous year against 42.75 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in total reserves, annual growth rate between Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 2.56 % change on previous year, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malawi rank globally for total reserves, annual growth rate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 11th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Total Reserves. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.