Guinea vs Pakistan: Total Reserves, annual growth rate
Guinea
44.44 % change on previous year
in 2016
Pakistan
43.97 % change on previous year
in 2025
Guinea rank
12th
Pakistan rank
13th
Total Reserves, annual growth rate over time
- Guinea
- Pakistan
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 44.44 % change on previous year against 43.97 % change on previous year in Pakistan, a difference of 0.47 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Pakistan ahead.
Guinea ranks 12th and Pakistan ranks 13th of 163 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.77 % change on previous year | 37.76 % change on previous year | 38.01 % change on previous year | Guinea |
| 2010s | 29.19 % change on previous year | 14.16 % change on previous year | 15.03 % change on previous year | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, annual growth rate, Guinea or Pakistan?
- Guinea, at 44.44 % change on previous year against 43.97 % change on previous year in Pakistan as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total reserves, annual growth rate between Guinea and Pakistan?
- 0.47 % change on previous year, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Pakistan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Guinea and Pakistan rank globally for total reserves, annual growth rate?
- Guinea ranks 12th and Pakistan ranks 13th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Total Reserves. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.