Guinea vs Uganda: Time to import (days)

Guinea
31 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Uganda
31 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Guinea rank
36th
Uganda rank
36th

Time to import (days) over time

  • Guinea
  • Uganda
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 31 DB06-15 methodology against 31 DB06-15 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uganda ahead.

Guinea ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 36th of 181 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 32 DB06-15 methodology 45.4 DB06-15 methodology 13.4 DB06-15 methodology Uganda
2010s 31.6 DB06-15 methodology 31.8 DB06-15 methodology 0.2 DB06-15 methodology Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time to import (days), Guinea or Uganda?
Guinea, at 31 DB06-15 methodology against 31 DB06-15 methodology in Uganda as of 2014.
What is the difference in time to import (days) between Guinea and Uganda?
0 DB06-15 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Uganda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea and Uganda rank globally for time to import (days)?
Guinea ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 36th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.