Chile vs Japan: Time to import (days)

Chile
12 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Japan
11 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Chile rank
140th
Japan rank
143rd

Time to import (days) over time

  • Chile
  • Japan
051015200520092014

How they compare

Chile currently reports 12 DB06-15 methodology against 11 DB06-15 methodology in Japan, a difference of 1 DB06-15 methodology.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 140th and Japan ranks 143rd of 181 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 16 DB06-15 methodology 11 DB06-15 methodology 5 DB06-15 methodology Chile
2010s 13.4 DB06-15 methodology 11 DB06-15 methodology 2.4 DB06-15 methodology Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time to import (days), Chile or Japan?
Chile, at 12 DB06-15 methodology against 11 DB06-15 methodology in Japan as of 2014.
What is the difference in time to import (days) between Chile and Japan?
1 DB06-15 methodology, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Japan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Chile and Japan rank globally for time to import (days)?
Chile ranks 140th and Japan ranks 143rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.