British Virgin Islands vs Jordan: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- British Virgin Islands
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 65.9% against 65.9% in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.
British Virgin Islands ranks 29th and Jordan ranks 28th of 67 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | British Virgin Islands | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.0% | 79.0% | 1.1% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 72.3% | 76.0% | 3.7% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, British Virgin Islands or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 65.9% against 65.9% in British Virgin Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between British Virgin Islands and Jordan?
- 0.0%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do British Virgin Islands and Jordan rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- British Virgin Islands ranks 29th and Jordan ranks 28th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/