Ghana vs Jordan: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- Ghana
- Jordan
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 73.6% against 71.8% in Jordan, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Jordan ahead.
Ghana ranks 12th and Jordan ranks 15th of 60 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.6% | 71.5% | 20.9% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 45.5% | 71.8% | 26.3% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Ghana or Jordan?
- Ghana, at 73.6% against 71.8% in Jordan as of 2012.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Ghana and Jordan?
- 1.8%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Jordan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2010.
- How do Ghana and Jordan rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Ghana ranks 12th and Jordan ranks 15th of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/