Laos vs Lithuania: Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, female
Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, female over time
- Laos
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2,538 number against 1,846 number in Laos, a difference of 692 number.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times Laos's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 60 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 195 number | 3,140 number | 2,945 number | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 284.5 number | 2,923 number | 2,638 number | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teachers in tertiary education isced 5 programmes, female, Laos or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 2,538 number against 1,846 number in Laos as of 2012.
- What is the difference in teachers in tertiary education isced 5 programmes, female between Laos and Lithuania?
- 692 number, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Lithuania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2007.
- How do Laos and Lithuania rank globally for teachers in tertiary education isced 5 programmes, female?
- Laos ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, female (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of female teachers in public and private short-cycle tertiary education institutions (ISCED 5). Teachers are persons employed full time or part time in an official capacity to guide and direct the learning experience of pupils and students, irrespective of their qualifications or the delivery mechanism, i.e. face-to-face and/or at a distance. This definition excludes educational personnel who have no active teaching duties (e.g. headmasters, headmistresses or principals who do not teach) and persons who work occasionally or in a voluntary capacity in educational institutions.