Equatorial Guinea vs Madagascar: State Capacity Index
Equatorial Guinea
-0.5207
in 2015
Madagascar
-0.6381
in 2015
Equatorial Guinea rank
147th
Madagascar rank
150th
State Capacity Index over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Madagascar
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -0.5207 against -0.6381 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.1174.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.8513 | -0.964 | 0.1127 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | -1.34 | -0.9441 | 0.4003 | Madagascar |
| 1980s | -1.16 | -0.7091 | 0.4504 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | -0.9922 | -0.9084 | 0.0839 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | -0.7732 | -0.511 | 0.2622 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.8159 | -0.6681 | 0.1479 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher state capacity index, Equatorial Guinea or Madagascar?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -0.5207 against -0.6381 in Madagascar as of 2015.
- What is the difference in state capacity index between Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
- 0.1174, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2015.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Madagascar rank globally for state capacity index?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 150th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as State Capacity Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measures state capacity by combining 21 different indicators related to three key dimensions: extractive capacity, coercive capacity, and administrative capacity. Higher values indicate greater state capacity.