Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in

Lao People's Democratic Republic
97.9%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
98.4%
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
35th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
32nd

Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020406080100199820082019

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 98.4% against 97.9% in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.5%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 179 countries.

Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 98.4% against 97.9% in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.5%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Tanzania, United Republic of?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-all-students-in-upper-secondary-education-enrolled-in-general-programmes-percent/lao-pdr/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-all-students-in-upper-secondary-education-enrolled-in-general-programmes-percent/lao-pdr/tanzania/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
224 places, 3,926 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total number of students enrolled in general programmes at the upper secondary education level, expressed as a percentage of the total number of students enrolled in all programmes (vocational and general) at the upper secondary level. General education is designed to develop learners’ general knowledge, skills and competencies and literacy and numeracy skills, often to prepare students for more advanced educational programmes at the same or higher ISCED levels and to lay the foundation for lifelong learning. General educational programmes are typically school- or college-based. General education includes educational programmes that are designed to prepare students for entry into vocational education, but that do not prepare for employment in a particular occupation or trade or class of occupations or trades, nor lead directly to a labour market relevant qualification.