Guyana vs Iceland: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas
Guyana
0 people
in 2024
Iceland
0 people
in 2024
Guyana rank
105th
Iceland rank
105th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas over time
- Guyana
- Iceland
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0 people against 0 people in Iceland, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 105th and Iceland ranks 105th of 175 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,798 people | 0 people | 7,798 people | Guyana |
| 2010s | 4,446 people | 0 people | 4,446 people | Guyana |
| 2020s | 996.92 people | 0 people | 996.92 people | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, Guyana or Iceland?
- Guyana, at 0 people against 0 people in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas between Guyana and Iceland?
- 0 people, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iceland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Iceland rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas?
- Guyana ranks 105th and Iceland ranks 105th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open defecation includes defecating in fields, forests, bushes, bodies of water or other open spaces, not using any sanitation facilities.