Comoros vs Zimbabwe: Rule of Law Index

Comoros
0.175
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.177
in 2025
Comoros rank
141st
Zimbabwe rank
140th

Rule of Law Index over time

  • Comoros
  • Zimbabwe
0.20.40.6190019622025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.177 against 0.175 in Comoros, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 173 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1900s 0.6448 0.568 0.0768 Comoros
1910s 0.6538 0.568 0.0858 Comoros
1940s 0.618 0.669 0.051 Zimbabwe
1950s 0.6256 0.6856 0.06 Zimbabwe
1960s 0.6044 0.5789 0.0255 Comoros
1970s 0.534 0.51 0.024 Comoros
1980s 0.2727 0.6526 0.3799 Zimbabwe
1990s 0.2805 0.6202 0.3397 Zimbabwe
2000s 0.3038 0.2099 0.0939 Comoros
2010s 0.2877 0.303 0.0153 Zimbabwe
2020s 0.1672 0.2047 0.0375 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law index, Comoros or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.177 against 0.175 in Comoros as of 2025.
What is the difference in rule of law index between Comoros and Zimbabwe?
0.002, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zimbabwe?
94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Zimbabwe rank globally for rule of law index?
Comoros ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rule of Law Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,303 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government complies with the law, courts are independent, laws transparent, justice accessible, corruption absent, and the bureaucracy is impartial.