New Caledonia vs Samoa: Rule of Law - Governance estimate
Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time
- New Caledonia
- Samoa
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 32nd and Samoa ranks 34th of 206 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Samoa |
| 2020s | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, New Caledonia or Samoa?
- New Caledonia, at 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between New Caledonia and Samoa?
- 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Samoa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Samoa rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
- New Caledonia ranks 32nd and Samoa ranks 34th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.