Latvia vs New Caledonia: Rule of Law - Governance estimate
Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time
- Latvia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Latvia ranks 30th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 206 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Latvia or New Caledonia?
- Latvia, at 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and New Caledonia rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
- Latvia ranks 30th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.