French Polynesia vs Slovenia: Rule of Law - Governance estimate
Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time
- French Polynesia
- Slovenia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Slovenia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 36th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 206 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8978 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9164 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0609 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, French Polynesia or Slovenia?
- French Polynesia, at 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between French Polynesia and Slovenia?
- 0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do French Polynesia and Slovenia rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
- French Polynesia ranks 36th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.