Costa Rica vs Italy: Rule of Law - Governance estimate

Costa Rica
0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Italy
0.6192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
57th
Italy rank
56th

Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Italy
00.20.40.60.81199620102024

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0.6192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Italy ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 57th and Italy ranks 56th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Italy Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8527 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Italy
2000s 0.5618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Italy
2010s 0.524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2020s 0.6339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Costa Rica or Italy?
Italy, at 0.6192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Costa Rica and Italy?
0.0025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Italy?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Italy rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
Costa Rica ranks 57th and Italy ranks 56th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Italy: Rule of Law - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/italy/">Costa Rica vs Italy: Rule of Law - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,294 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.