Costa Rica vs Israel: Rule of Law - Governance estimate

Costa Rica
0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Israel
0.5997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
57th
Israel rank
59th

Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Israel
00.250.50.7511.2199620102024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel, a difference of 0.017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Israel ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 57th and Israel ranks 59th of 207 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Israel Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2000s 0.5618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8755 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2010s 0.524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel
2020s 0.6339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Costa Rica or Israel?
Costa Rica, at 0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel as of 2024.
What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Costa Rica and Israel?
0.017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Israel?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Israel rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
Costa Rica ranks 57th and Israel ranks 59th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Israel: Rule of Law - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/israel/">Costa Rica vs Israel: Rule of Law - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,294 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.