Brunei vs French Polynesia: Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Brunei
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0.6737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was French Polynesia ahead.
Brunei ranks 55th and French Polynesia ranks 57th of 208 countries.
French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0.6193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Brunei or French Polynesia?
- Brunei, at 0.6737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Brunei and French Polynesia?
- 0.0246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and French Polynesia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Brunei and French Polynesia rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
- Brunei ranks 55th and French Polynesia ranks 57th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.