Bhutan vs Chile: Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Bhutan
0.7218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Chile
0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Bhutan rank
50th
Chile rank
52nd

Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Chile
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.7218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile, a difference of 0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.

Bhutan ranks 50th and Chile ranks 52nd of 208 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Chile Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2000s 0.0766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 0.4113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6376 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 0.7222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Bhutan or Chile?
Bhutan, at 0.7218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Bhutan and Chile?
0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Chile?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Chile rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
Bhutan ranks 50th and Chile ranks 52nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Chile: Rule of Law - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/chile/">Bhutan vs Chile: Rule of Law - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,527 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.