Bahrain vs Rwanda: Rule of Law - Governance estimate

Bahrain
0.1679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Rwanda
0.1003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bahrain rank
90th
Rwanda rank
93rd

Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time

  • Bahrain
  • Rwanda
-1.5-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 0.1679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Bahrain's figure about 1.7 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bahrain ahead.

Bahrain ranks 90th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 206 countries.

Bahrain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahrain
2000s 0.2767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahrain
2010s -0.0405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahrain
2020s 0.0471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Bahrain or Rwanda?
Bahrain, at 0.1679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Bahrain and Rwanda?
0.0676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bahrain and Rwanda rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
Bahrain ranks 90th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahrain vs Rwanda: Rule of Law - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahrain/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahrain/rwanda/">Bahrain vs Rwanda: Rule of Law - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,270 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.