Aruba vs San Marino: Rule of Law - Governance estimate
Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- San Marino
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino, a difference of 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was San Marino ahead.
Aruba ranks 25th and San Marino ranks 28th of 206 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8626 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2010s | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2245 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Aruba or San Marino?
- Aruba, at 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Aruba and San Marino?
- 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and San Marino?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and San Marino rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 25th and San Marino ranks 28th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.